written, sent but not I got.
, of \u200b\u200bcourse fashion writing workshops in the Art & Fashion Festival 2010 at the Old Brewery. I hope that I lost in a straight fight to the lightness of the pen, though an inner voice tells me that the jury could have quite a different view on the subject of my column. Anyway, continue to maintain that assumption panties on his head shows a courage, and not evidence of being a Fashionista. just as I believe that white square on a white background vel. heap on the plate is not a work of art. even conceptual. [despite the fact that in the case of Lady Gaga's no concept of no way, because it is merely a simple, cheap sensation] .
and with all due respect to Mother Szafiarki - from which it drew inspiration guiding the password, and which apparently does not practice what it preaches claim - do not change my opinion. but I'm very curious your opinions.
clothing Vs. disguise
Ś world has moved on to the Internet - and that some time ago - which sparked widespread discussion and debate, philosophical, and panic among the editors of glossy magazines. Sowed panic is probably unnecessary, after all, there is nothing more enjoyable than the fresh paging through Vogue any nationality with a cup of latte, plucking at the brunches salad in a place where you are now to visit. Although you might as well take with you, just as fresh (as Vogue and salad), IPAD and the mods wkliknąć oracle style.com to see who is sitting in the front row at fashion week, wherever it is held. Following up site visits to fashion for The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, let's look who gets his new Sartorialist on the streets, for the record we are moving yet to Garance Doré to eventually unload at Net-a-Porter and fall in love with a handbag two national averages. For relief of nerve and maintain financial liquidity decide to szafiarki home, which they hunt for their treasures in the second handach, buying a kilogram bags for a song. For us, fashion freaks, the Internet is a paradise on your doorstep. In a few moments, we can get acquainted with the latest trends, inspire blogerkami and empty your kredytówkę, not moving up from the salad. Not once had the pleasure to realize such a scenario. Now, however, fanning cavernous network, I stopped at the watchword szafiarstwa Polish mother, Ryfka the Wardrobe Sztywniary blog: garment disguise. Are you sure, mother szafiarko?
J ako conscious participant in the phenomenon, which we may call a broad culture of fashion, I know that the sets of runs are not copies, should be interpreted, taking what gets us in rejecting it, in which the we do not feel, adding a large dose of individual character, which is our benchmark. I also know, after centuries spent in front of the mirror, what styles emphasize what is best in me, and hide the imperfections of nature (or the consequences side of dessert eaten after this low-calorie salad.) As an employee, but I am perfectly aware of what is the dress code and that What you see can sometimes do a lot more than najpieczołowiciej prepared presentation. A lot of the rules as a morning 'what should I wear? " But all things that look beautiful and on the spot, and the devil is in the details and where you can not pofrywolić of fatałaszkami, where original features give advice. It's not that piece of cake, to compose a perfectly matched outfit the season and one day, occasion, mood, figure, nature, and domestic resources. And yet, so everything seemed a little nonchalant and casually, as if I did not spent a half hour stylizations.
N ieistotne if my style is classic and elegant, or boho-vintage'owy, or throw myself in the eyes, or hide in the blackness. Anyway - I beg for my Vuitton - never, ever mean a prosperous zamieniłabym my closet to wear to the theater dressing room to dressing. Normal Thursday in mid-September, even if it just falls during one of fashion weeks, remains the ordinary, law Thursday of autumn. Halloween celebrate just once a year. In November. But not everyone is the same opinion. Quite the contrary. Some cases continually celebrate this charade.
In the big world of fashion, big stars go wild on a grand scale. Lady Gaga at the MTV Video Music Awards 2010 appeared in the dress of meat, meat with meat shoes and handbag under his arm, which of course raised another wave of sensation. Not the first nor the last time the audience was divided into scandalized and delighted. The fact that Lady Gaga is already a kind of brand. Bold, shocking, yet thought-creation, each time using a new, seemingly unsuitable items such as glasses with cigarettes in the video for the song Telephone . Chapeau bas for fantasy, consistency and coherence of the image. Stage because Gaga, Gaga is the same as pozasceniczna, which in most cases simply obscene. I daresay that even her pajamas does not look like pajamas. Well, This specific situation. Glut on the record market forces to use drastic measures to get noticed. Even for the price to do with each other from time to time monsters. But what about the characters from the industry? Tavi Gevinson, 13-year-old blogger from the United States styled on the old woman is treated on a par with the editors of the most prestigious fashion magazines, and her hat-ribbon focused on a greater interest than the Dior show, which he founded. Is this child with gray hair, dressed in clothes that probably even my grandmother would find it outdated, really dictates now trends? Does this girl actually ahead of their time stylish sensibility, or perhaps the leading designers are so fearful of passing time and the imminent retirement, that will tickle a minor fashion-icon-wannabe than to say out loud that the emperor is naked ? Tavi's leave. Came out quite recently, and can disappear just as quickly and spectacularly as it appeared. This can not be said about the true icon, an experienced and recognized for many years standing in the world of fashion, Annie Piaggia. Style of this talented Italian journalist Vogue is a sophisticated, deliberately, very original and at least eccentric, but taking a slightly different point of view, it can be regarded as a rather grotesque. Piaggia is reportedly a walking museum of fashion and has in her closet than two thousand dresses and the same pairs of pants - all from world famous designers, some from the late nineteenth century. The undoubted expert in his field. Yet her image, though noble, branded, so hard to pigeonhole the passing trends of the season and will not even think how much that costs, borders on circus-kitsch aesthetic. Similarly, matter is with Iris Apfel, clothing collector, whose collection was shown at an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum in New York. Serene old lady in the huge glasses, exaggerated, colorful character he once saw not forget, patron, mentor, expert, authority.
C s clothes so actually the disguise? Does an individual style to the pantheon of icons windujący equal to the grotesque? Why is the determinant of the nature of the fashion girl was earnestly trying to convince the world that is 75 years old, two old ladies in a clown makeup, dressing up in colored feathers like the pre-school Balik and the woman who, yes, do not fight with his age, but completely forgotten that eating is to eat a bit less to wear?
P slaughter most of my conscious life I've been staring at the four women: Marilyn Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, Coco Chanel and Jacqueline Kennedy. In a first for the expression of femininity, sensuality and sexuality unimposing. The one for subtlety, slim, charm and girlish, sometimes raffish grace. In the third of a revolution in fashion, cult clothing, timeless bags and artificial pearls. And in the fourth - the undeniably a class in itself and the manner in which she wore minimalist dresses, modest form of which is filled with the strength of her character. None of them looked like a phantom of the opera.
B strive maybe I'm naive, but perhaps not. Perhaps in today's era of color without barriers, and the existence of a longing desire to differentiate itself already took the form of absurdity. Maybe we should say to paraphrase Horace aloud: dare to be beautiful, because the original art oszpecania opanowałyśmy already perfected.
U is taking so that we decorate. The disguise is a means to hide who we really are and just get us to the role of the hanger at the ball theatrical mannequins. I will definitely be dressed. But fashion is a polyphonic not tolerate autocracy and one tone, and everyone is a god of his cabinet .
it is called parallel thinking:) and a good point - the most powerful kobietą w świecie mody jest Anna Wintour. widzieliście ją kiedyś przebraną za klowna???
sorry english readers. i'm not gonna translate this one (at least not now). it's too long and i'm constantly in a rush. but stay tuned. new posts are comming soon.
0 comments:
Post a Comment